Response to In Defense of the Poor Image:
In this reading, Hito writes that poor image resolution brings down the value of the work. Images of high quality are sold in upscale environments, whereas poor images curculate as DVDs, broadcast TV or online. However, there is also a slight undertone which makes the reader question if Hito believes this. Is she for or against poor quality images. In most of the reading, it is confusing to determine what side Hito is truly on. I believe that poor quality images can be interpreted as artistic impression if the artist purposely made the image poor quality to add to the value of the work. I think, if done well, a well placed, poor quality image could add value to an image.
No comments:
Post a Comment